SVHC Home > Blogs > Mark Novotny

Is there a healthcare system?

Is there a health care system? In a word, no. I find myself chuckling internally whenever I hear politicians talk about reforming our health care system.  In the United States, we have a patchwork quilt that is barely stitched together with an incredible variety of rich resources, absent resources, good insurance, lousy insurance, no insurance, and providers of care that provide good quality and poor quality. In fact, for the price we pay, we have the most expensive health care in the world with performance that is only fair.

For $5,700 per person per year, the performance of our health care “system” scored 66 out of a 100 on international review of health care outcomes. click for reference  14 countries perform better than the United States in death rates for diseases considered treatable by healthcare, and all at lower-cost than we do. We spend an enormous amount of money on end-of-life care and elective procedures that provide small benefits to people, while not adequately using preventive strategies and effective care for the chronically ill.

Doctors are frustrated with lack of payment for things that could make a big difference, like effective systems to care for chronic illness. Employers are fed up with the high cost of health insurance, and their subsidy of government underpayment for the cost of health care services. Yet this issue has not reached the top of the list of topics that Americans consider important politically.  And it’s a very hard topic to discuss in a “sound bite.”

But there is absolutely no system. The quality and availability of healthcare varies by family, employer, city, state, health care facility, physician group, and a variety of other factors that are not applied according to need.  In my view it’s really unethical, and screams for standardization and the building of a real system.  Is it fair that if you’re a child of a family that’s unemployed you have a different health system than that a child of a family that has employment? Fortunately, here in Vermont, it’s very hard to be a child without insurance.  But that’s not at all true in all states.

Building a system won’t be easy. But neither was building an Interstate Highway system, or sending humans to the moon. First it takes leadership and political will, and then it takes reorganization of the healthcare resources and a more even and fair application of those resources to the interventions that will help the most people.

 

Comments


June 1. 2007 16:32

Gravatar

Gee, leadership and political will. That sounds easy enough! :)

This topic has been the subject of debate in political campaigns for a while, now, but it doesn't seem to have gained traction. At what point does this crisis become impossible to ignore among our leaders who have the power to make a difference?

Would it be feasible and/or advisable for other states to come up with their own systems, as Vermont has done, or would that only increase the variability of standards - a crazy quilt (http://bleakbeauty.com/quilt_portfolio/quilt_01.html) instead of a patchwork quilt (which at least has some reason to it)?

Rebecca




June 4. 2007 10:04

Gravatar

Rebecca,
States are coming up with their own systems. And states area a great 'laboratory' for trying new ideas. The challenge for States is government payment for health care- Medicare and Medicaid make up more than half of the revenue for most states. Since the rules for these programs are federal,it's a challenge for a state to be really creative while leaving those rules in place. Recently the Feds have been more willing to give 'waivers' to allow experimentation. Governors are likely to be driving significant change in the next year or two. Yes - a crazy quilt, but we need the ideas.

mark novotny



Add comment


(will show your Gravatar icon)  

  Country flag




© 2007 Southwestern Vermont Health Care
 

Sign in